This Is American Soccer, US Soccer, MNT, WNT, and MLS - Tackling the subject of Soccer in the US, and worldwide.

turning the page… or not

After about 48 hours of reading articles about the weekend’s US MNT game, I’m pretty much sick of the subject. Too much of a good thing you might say. On the other hand, I’m even more excited for Wednesday given what we saw on Sunday, and it has me wondering about the line-up. Will we see more 1st and 2nd CAPS or will more of our (relatively speaking) veterans (some of whom have as much to prove about their form as the youngsters) be standing on the field at time zero? In the countless conversations I’ve had about the Ecuador match, the theories are split. Now it’s your turn to be the US MNT coach. Hey, you never know, that interim tag is still dangling.

There is the idea that Bradley should be looking at all the options at this early stage of the world cup cycle, as Greg Seltzer at Yanks Abroad argued for. Or there is the theory that we need to give our most likely starters as much time together on the field as possible, which honestly, I can’t find an article in support of. No matter, there are good arguments for either position under the context of the best way to build a team.

Bob Bradley – and no doubt his interim tag must compound this even in his own mind – has been burning the candle at both ends a bit. In other words, if you want to see what the new guys can offer, you need to play them for more than 5, 10 minutes. If you want to put priority on building a unit that in three years plays like Arsenal, than substitute in emergencies only. Bradley is yet to show his hand here. Wednesday’s game, against a lesser opponent than previous matches, along with the fact that Howard, Onyewu, and Bocanegra are back in England, Bradley is going to have to pick at least a few different faces.

While most are arguing for the evaluation of more players, call me crazy, but I can see the worth in the latter option, especially given that speed of play and continuity on the pitch have never been the strong suits of the US MNT. But we do need to figure out which youngins will be getting the frequent flyer miles this summer. But it would be nice to enter those tournaments with a squad that has played more than a few minutes together; we’re talking about only two more games before the Gold Cup. But can anybody absolutely know what that line-up should be at this point?

Point. Counterpoint. They just keep coming, around and around one after the other as if amusement park swing chairs in relentless pursuit. So I’m going to get out of the way before I get nauseous or knocked out and hold out for tomorrow. I can’t remember the last time I seriously anticipated the line-up for a friendly.

zilla
on Mar 27th, 2007 - 2:43pm

“Or there is the theory that we need to give our most likely starters as much time together on the field as possible, which honestly, I can’t find an article in support of.”

I haven’t seen that article either, but I found it interesting in listening to Kasey Keller’s podcast interview from ussoccer.com that he brought that very thing up.

pete
on Mar 27th, 2007 - 5:35pm

i was all for the rookies before you mentioned that we only have two games before the gold cup starts. now i’m leaning toward playing our best and subbing on one or two positions that may be totally up for grabs - i’m thinking about our backline mostly - giving two players each 45 minutes. player evaluation has to be predominately done at the club level and training camps. this whole debate is of course a great case for scheduling as many friendlies as possible.

Ric
on Mar 27th, 2007 - 5:43pm

If I were coach, I’d play the younger guys tomorrow.
Then the Gold Cup takes precedence this summer, so that gets our “A” Team.
Then we send some of our younger guys, MLSers, and some of those that we can pry from Europe (since, last I remember, Euro teams wouldnt be required to release our guys for Copa, but would for the Gold Cup, our regional tourney). A lot of these “B” team members probably haven’t played much in a situation that Copa would present, whereas the “A” Teamers most likely have. Give them that experience.

At least, without thinking about it too much, that’s what I’d do.

Mark in NRH
on Mar 27th, 2007 - 10:55pm

I think there will be a heavy contingent of new faces tomorrow. I think we’ll see younger Bradley, Feilb … Felbh … (crap, you know who I’m talking about — I won’t try to spell his name), Spector, maybe Jay DeMerit. But I think he’ll throw Keller, Donovan, Conrad, and Beasley in for experience and a stabilizing factor. I doubt Bradley wants to turn this into a defacto U23 game.

Kyle
on Mar 28th, 2007 - 10:11am

yanks-abroad also ran an article about how we wouldn’t be able to bring our best to both the gold cup and copa america for club reasons. If that’s the case, then let the youngsters take the reigns at the gold cup. It’s lower competition anyway, and let our ‘A’ team go against the heavyweights like Brazil and Argentina.

There are arguments that the gold cup has world cup implications and so we should send our best there, but I don’t see any reason to worry about qualifying anymore. A much bigger concern is our lack of play against world class competition.

Vinny
on Mar 28th, 2007 - 12:52pm

I think that the comments by Ric a few posts back were spot on: Send the younger, untested guys to Copa America. Where else are they going to get that kind of experience? Certainly not by playing the Gold Cup on home soil or MLS. Yes, the prestige of the tournament argues we send the best team possible, but it’s the future development of USMNT that’s at stake. Give them the toughest on-the-job training possible. Personally I think they’d represent well, but if they happen take a beating, so what? The experience the will have gained is immeasurable.

Pat M
on Mar 28th, 2007 - 2:08pm

We have gotten to the point as a soccer nation that we should not be losing games to Guatemala, Jamaica, Honduras and the like.

With the exception of Costa Rica on the odd day, the Gold Cup is a three game tune up before the inevitable match with Mexico. Once Bradley picks his squad for the Gold Cup, he can use the pre-tournament camp and the preliminary games to gel his team.

Right now he has to figure out who his team is (and who is going to Copa America). One of the criticisms of the Arena regime was that they were too set in thier squad and refused to give certain players a deserved look and chance. I’m glad Bradley is at least making sure he has evaluated his squad adequately.

Ric
on Mar 28th, 2007 - 6:11pm

I’d also suggest that winning the Gold Cup would put us in the Confederations Cup in 2009. Which will be held in South Africa. So winning that tournament this year means we play games against continental champs from everywhere in a location we want to be familiar with.

leave a comment items marked with * are required

Recent Comments

  • Donj: Question for the two guys from Atlanta lamenting the fact that there is no MLS team in their city to go see: do...
  • mikheil topuria: i am a footballer, i am 20, i played in many geogrian teams. i am a forvard and i am a bombardir. i...
  • Jim: Miami will have MLS soon.
  • Andrew: Soccer has a relatively good base, but that base has two major problems. 1. All kinds of kids play soccer,...
  • Timoteo: I believe the success of a sport is directly related to the number of youths in a country who play the game...