the Cosmos, for free!
Cosmos’ owner wants bygones to be bygones, and someone to take the team into MLS
In the May issue of Britain’s FourFourTwo magazine Welsh midfielder and onetime New Englander Andy Dorman lists his MLS highlights as such: Winning the US Open Cup, playing against Cuauhtemoc Blanco, and “also, one time New York brought the old Cosmos players over and I met Pele and Beckenbauer. Not much tops that.”
You can’t go very long in the American soccer world before running into the Cosmos, be it through celebration of their successes or condemnation of their part in the NASL collapse. Today it may be little more than a tape library hidden away in New Jersey, but for sure people know the name; a foreign magazine sees no need to print explanation.
And while it’s hard to get past the fact that MLS built its entire league in direct financial opposition to seemingly everything the Cosmos stood for—a high-powered SuperClub built to thrill audiences and roll over lesser opponents—the Designated Player rule now allows for at least one big signing per team, The Beckham Experiment will teach a few lessons, and the upcoming collective bargaining will at least test the stubborn salary cap.
Sure it’s still a frugal league, but MLS is inching towards the Cosmos.
The last time Peppe Pinton, owner to the rights of all things Cosmos, spoke publicly the problem with resurrecting the Cosmos was a suspected grudge MLS held for the NASL. The ESPN headline read: “Cosmos’ legacy yet to be fully embraced by MLS.”
Almost two years later to the day, the bottom line has not changed. Nearly all of Kristian Dyer’s article still holds true (as does a New York Times article from 2003 about Pele possibly putting the team into MLS)—yes, the Cosmos have a tremendous history in successfully pioneering a soccer franchise into a global brand, and no, they haven’t played a game in over twenty years—but there has been one change.
Pinton is still baffled it hasn’t been the Cosmos, but with the entry of the Whitecaps, Timbers, and Sounders into MLS, it can no longer “be argued that MLS, in its attempt to learn from history, has avoided the NASL, shunning the former franchises and players of the defunct league,” as Dyer asserted in 2007.
And that alone has changed Peppe Pinton. “The Metrostars approached the Cosmos,” he told me during a recent phone interview. “And at that time I was not asking any money. I was just not interested. I didn’t think that was the right time, but this is the right time.”
The talkative businessman has changed his tune, but it is his tone that might have made the greater transformation. Where he and Giorgio Chinaglia were once all but baiting the MLS offices into argument, Pinton is now complementing the league (while, of course, continuing to trumpet the Cosmos). He saw a new Philadelphia franchise budding with support and went as far as to contact the owners about taking his brand. Now he’s watching a beautiful soccer stadium going up just down the river from his New Jersey offices and thinks two teams could share it. He’s done a lot of thinking, and he is ready for more change.
In a candid conversation with TIAS Pinton said he is ready to once and for all get the Cosmos in MLS, offering the brand “free and clear” to the right ownership. You might call it a once in a lifetime opportunity. But there is that little problem of finding someone who wants to pony up the expansion fee and invest in a second New York team. And that’s where the talk runs dry, because until an owner puts forth a bid to MLS, Pinton can do nothing but continue to talk. If only he had the money to simply buy a victory this time around.
—-
TIAS: There are a couple of pieces that come out from time to time and they’re not always positive for the Cosmos. Who’s fault is that?
Pinton: Contrary to what some people may want for the Cosmos, it is not a ghost. Everyone is talking about it, on the street and high level circles. I have been an advocate and pioneer and curator, maintaining and preserving everything the Cosmos are: memorabilia and trophies which are unprecedented in America to videos, logos, trademarks, images, copyrights. For a long period of time in this area around New York soccer has had a climb with the Cosmos ceasing to play.
So why has it been quiet on the Cosmos front?
Sometimes I ask that same question myself. But one must identify of who to ask the question. There’s gotta be a platform and a venue for the Cosmos to turn. I have done my best financially and emotionally to preserve this thing with one focus: that the brand of the Cosmos would be revived for the benefit of the fans, in New York and all over the world. So again this brand can shine and join a league that would benefit from its inclusion, in the media, in the merchandising, worldwide.
I have done all of that and continue to try to do this. I do not just sit in an office waiting for someone. I have pursued and pursued and pursued aspiring owners, some of who are already in league. Some were just curious. Some contemplated it. There was a period of dormancy in soccer here from when NASL closed to the World Cup in 1994. Then soccer began to generate some energy after the Cup and after MLS started. And from that point I have sought from MLS, with various ideas, options, and business plans—from the Yankees and Mets organizations, to Andrew Murstein who owns the taxi company Mediallian, who was very close to getting something together, to the Red Bulls with who we participated with and licensed footage and licensed the brand for their opening game with Beckenbauer and Pele—I’m trying to say to you that I have approached everyone in hopes of reviving this franchise. I spoke to the owners of the new Philadelphia franchise in regards to possibly name that franchise the Cosmos. We know that would be the extremist move—the name should be in New York—but I spent about 5 months on it. The New York market had been taken by Red Bull—I spoke to the Metrostars management to contemplate a name-change and revival, but did not carry it to fruition. Along the way there is always business decisions that keep things from coming to life.
But make no mistake, it is not because I ever asked a dollar for the Cosmos. I’ve never asked a penny. Although there is an investment of 20, almost 30 years, in keeping an office open and the brand out in the marketplace and in the minds of the fans. That’s not to discuss what it has taken to protect the trademark both worldwide and here in the U.S. The value associated with that—the intellectual property—is there. If you have to pay $5000 a month for rent for the last 25 years, that is something. But I have never asked someone to give me so much for the Cosmos. Because the Cosmos are not for sale. I would like to see an entity that is interested in actually doing something—revive the team, join a league, and put this whole thing to bed. I’ve been trying to find that right organization and have always invited media and anyone to look and see what I’m doing. I am an open book. I don’t hold secrets.
So say the Wilpons (Met’s owners) come to you…
That’s the kind of entity and ownership that I am looking for to dignify and elevate and benefit from the Cosmos. I’ve worked too hard, mentally, physically, and monetarily to not see that happen. Something like that would be a gain to everyone—to the entity, to the Cosmos, and to the fans. And the world. This is a global game, and the Cosmos are our global brand. We don’t have to worry about jealousy now. Some people will say, “Hold on, we’re gonna create another Yankees. We don’t want another Yankees. We want a league that is all the same.” But no matter the Cosmos brand will shine. This is not a joke. In 1983 I owned Lazio, a first division team in Rome. You see, some people don’t know who Peppe Pinton is. Why is it then surprising that people are upset that I own the Cosmos? I purchased Lazio and then exited there because of my love for the Cosmos, my love for New York—it was more than my love for Lazio or the country even where I was born.
What’s the next step?
The next step is very simple. What I realized at Lazio, and what makes sports so great in many places, is to have a second franchise in the same city. Rome and Lazio. Inter Milan and Milan. Juventus and Torino. Particularly—and I think MLS is doing this in LA—the New York market. You need to create competition—Mets and Yankees. You could have Red Bull and Cosmos here in New York—and they could be playing in the same stadium for heaven’s sake. I played Lazio in Olympic Stadium with Roma. No big deal. The economics become much better. Stadiums have empty dates that need to be filled. They are already building their own stadiums all over MLS. Now let’s fill them, while creating rivalry and fan appeal. What needs to be done is lift this asset which is free and clear—I repeat: free and clear for any team. There is no doubt, no loophole. Someone can have the same franchise that Pele and Beckenbauer played for. They get all the trophies, all the history that I have preserved. We never went bankrupt, never went away—it’s the same as it was 30 years ago. It’s the same company. I am the principle of this company and so many people say why don’t I give them back? I am interested to see what anybody has in terms of ideas. I spent three years working with Andrew Murstein who came to me and wanted to start a New York franchise. Legal fees and other costs alone I paid. I was very willing to give it over for what he wanted. I never negotiated any more or less from him. I have reached out to the Mets organization. I basically said, if they were to acquire a franchise, the Cosmos is an available brand to them. I didn’t discuss money. There was no discussing money, and at the time no interest from them to go forward with a franchise, so I have not spoken to them since.
Bottom line, what do you want out of such a deal?
I have never said I even needed to be at a press conference. Make no mistake, I want people finally to know who I am. I have never been an egotistic man. There is no ego about who I am. I have done so much in soccer and out of soccer. I basically retired from soccer at the age of 38. So this is not my entire life. This is not about ego. The trophy case alone of the Cosmos is probably worth a bundle of money, but this is not about me, this is about the people, the fans of New York. They deserve the Cosmos.
I want to refrain from speaking on behalf of the league, but I am open to the league. I have always had an open door with the league. I have had great communication with the league. I have had people from the league in my office, and I have toured the league’s offices.
The Cosmos have a brand name that will make millions for a franchise. I don’t want to knock any other franchises out there, but name one for me today in the U.S. that has reached the level of magnitude that the Cosmos reached. It’s been a long time, but people still know it all over the world. If I am a soccer investor, I would like to embrace this—and you don’t have to embrace Peppe Pinton. It’s never been about that. I am not taking anything away. On the contrary, I have preserved something for the people to have back.
I don’t want to give anybody suggestions, but for a period of time, they could be sharing a stadium until another one is built here. And with the Seattle Sounders and Vancouver Whitecaps and Portland coming into the league, I think it is the right time for the Cosmos to follow those former NASL brands into the league. I have to be very careful because at times the Cosmos has not been embraced the right way from soccer. But when the league signed Beckham, people talked about the Cosmos. It was Beckham-Cosmos, Cosmos-Beckham. The Cosmos paved the way for soccer. The Cosmos did a lot of work and still do. We’re working on youth development with the Cosmos camps and through that and other areas keeping the brand out there.
After all the back and forth over the years, what would you like people to know about you?
People don’t know me. And I want them to know me. I mean, why shouldn’t I be the owner of the Cosmos? You could own it if you did the right thing back in the day to own it. Why shouldn’t I be the guy to own Lazio? I bought it, so I owned it, and then I sold it. So why should anybody be the owner of anything? I am the owner of the New York Cosmos, and the people are the owners of the New York Cosmos, so let’s try to get them back—not to fill my pocketbook; that’s not what it is all about. If people think that, they are wrong, about the brand, the dignity, and the people who want them back. Some people thought the Cosmos were too much to handle in the soccer market, to live up to MLS’s reputation—but that is stretching it.
Why do you think you’ve often been portrayed as the villain?
It surprises me because I know who I am, and the people who know me, know who I am. There is such a sense of jealousy out there that is very rich toward me, because of the power of the brand and how many people want it. And they wish they had it themselves. This is after the fact. Where were people from 1985 to 1995, when MLS came. The Metrostars approached the Cosmos, and at that time I was not asking any money. I was just not interested. I didn’t think that was the right time, but this is the right time. The league has done a marvelous job. People are making big investments with the league. They are committed to it. The interest is rising. And now the Cosmos could play a role and help them continue growing. The Cosmos would be better today in a name and market point of view than it was before, because the league is very very strong and here to stay. Everything is there for the Cosmos to return and thrive. Nevermind how many people you could pull into the stands. The Cosmos is a brand that will be globally recognized. A lot of people who talk bad about me, but the fact is, if we want the Cosmos to come back we need to stay positive.
—-
photos from inside Cosmos headquarters in New Jersey courtesy of Cosmos Soccer Club, Inc.
















Brian Costello
on May 4th, 2009 - 10:06pm
Awesome crazy stuff. The return of a Cosmos franchise could be something that would generate all kinds of press and presence for MLS and soccer in general, but they would–similar to the Beckham Experiment–be expected to be world class right away . . . just like their predecessors. It would be a tricky balance but interesting to see. Though having a character like Pinton around would certainly add some flavor.
danielfarrell
on May 5th, 2009 - 5:01am
Can’t say I came away impressed with Pinton here. He missed his opportunity to put the Cosmos into MLS a long time ago. The Metrostars/Red Bulls should have been the Cosmos. It would have helped the league become successful. Now that the league has become successful and stable he now wants in? Sorry, you missed that boat.
New York should probably get a second team in MLS at some point, but let’s make it in the city and not two teams down in Jersey. Let’s see what FC New York can do in USL and if they can become an organization that can be that second team.
Sorry Peppe, you missed your chance.
New York Cosmos Are On The Market (40 Years Later) - - The Offside - New York Red Bulls Soccer Blog
on May 5th, 2009 - 8:01am
[...] Adam Spangler at “This Is American Soccer” scored a revealing interview with past and present owner of the New York Cosmos name, franchise and trademark, Mr. Peppe Pinton. The colorful owner was as outspoken and flamboyant as ever, touting the Cosmos name, his role in bringing the team to prominence and his insistence on protecting and maintaining the good image and reputation of the team in tact. [...]
Tuesday’s Links « The Kartik Report
on May 5th, 2009 - 8:36am
[...] May 5, 2009 · 1 Comment Today’s Pick: Adam Spangler’s interview with Pepe Pinton about the possible return of the Cosmos name. [...]
Gordon Shumway
on May 5th, 2009 - 10:58am
I need to agree with Daniel Farrell. Peppe needed to take a chance on the league at the beginning. Maybe he was not impressed with the MetroStars management and that was a reason to think it was not time. The MetroStars had players who were ball boys for the Cosmos (so did D.C. United), so that would have been a good time to show some guts. NY may deserve a second team and maybe the time will be ripe again. Seattle kept the Sounders alive all of these years as an actual team, same with Portland and Vancouver.
Sgc
on May 5th, 2009 - 2:19pm
To be fair, I think the league wanted nothing to do with the NASL or the Cosmos at the time, considering it a legacy of excess and failure, and at the same time an unfair (because unsustainable) standard to compare to. Remember, there were ZERO NASL names in MLS at the time. Soon there will be four.
The league’s attitude is somewhat different today. There’s even this quote from Garber recently:
http://www.bigapplesoccer.com/teams/redbulls2.php?article_id=17999
“We need a strong team in the New York area,” he said. “We’ve been working hard to try to achieve that. I’ve come to realize that without having a great facility when particularly you’ve got Yankee Stadium, CitiField opening up and Giants Stadium, it’s difficult to compete. But we’ll be able to compete now with Red Bull Arena. It will help this team capture some of the spirit that has been seeking to regain from yesteryear, back to the days of the Cosmos and the early days of the MetroStars. I think this is a step in the right direction.”
That was April 14. I think you can write it down as historic, because it’s probably the very first time we’ve heard a Commish compare the Cosmos favorably to what’s going on today. Even if he is trying to minimize it a little bringing up early Metros and Red Bull Arena, it means the league is not afraid of that legacy anymore.
Does that mean a Cosmos return? I’m not holding my breath, but it’s a fascinating peek into the evolving self-confidence of the league we have today.
Rob
on May 5th, 2009 - 8:26pm
I agree with Sgc. For MLS to have the opportunity to have success, it could not have the pressure and high expectations with former NASL teams, especially the Cosmos. Having the Cosmos name in the league so early puts its own name and market at risk as well. Had the club failed to see success, the value and history behind the name would have been severely damaged. While many clubs still aren’t necessarily profitable, the quality of the game, the management of the clubs, and the strength of fan-bases all provide an appropriate environment for an expansion Cosmos team. I find it hard to believe Pinton’s ego isn’t a factor, but his regard for and the desire to protect the Cosmos brand seems genuine.
As MLS looks for expansion markets, I don’t think it would be out of bounds for Garber to publicly state that MLS is open to recreating the Cosmos in New York if the right investment group and expansion plan presented itself. The success of other reborn NASL teams as well as FC New York’s fan-base should be considered; however, bringing the Cosmos back to life would not only revive the Cosmos brand, but bring a lot of value to MLS as well. As far as expectations? The clubs grand history would be less of a factor now then it would back then since it would still have the expectations normally associated with an expansion team.
dave
on May 6th, 2009 - 9:57am
I have never understood the antagonism towards Pinton held by some fans, or their willingness to believe that Pinton “wanted a million dollars for the Cosmos rights” or some such nonsense.
MLS made it very clear in 1996 that it wanted to avoid all associations with the NASL. Tampa Bay could have had the Rowdies name, and San Jose could have had the Earthquakes name, for free (and San Jose eventually did switch) but MLS was not interested. I highly doubt that the 1996-era MLS ever had any serious interest in acquiring the rights to the Cosmos name.
Now that we see the long term success and fan interest in preserving NASL era names (Earthquakes in San Jose, fans voting to keep the Sounders name in Seattle, Vancouver Whitecaps and Portland Timbers joining MLS, Tampa Bay Rowdies joining USL, etc), MLS is starting to change its attitudes towards the NASL.
It’s all very well to blame the failure of the NASL for having no serious pro soccer in the USA circa 1984-1995, but without the NASL we’d have almost no soccer at all in the USA at any level. NASL laid the foundations on which present MLS success is built; it is foolish to deny that fact.
FC Uptown
on May 6th, 2009 - 11:26am
Excellent article. Cosmos will be back, just a matter of time.
Daily Dose: May 6th, 2009 | The Offside
on May 6th, 2009 - 9:11pm
[...] Return of the New York Cosmos? (This is American Soccer) [...]
peppy lepew
on May 8th, 2009 - 2:34am
peppy pinton should hook up with FC New York, bring the Cosmos back in 2010, why not? while theyre at it sign Ronaldo Fenomeno, win the league, get promoted to MLS. match made in heaven,,,
Zoti
on May 8th, 2009 - 7:45pm
There’s only way to bring back the Cosmos to MLS: Rebrand Red Bulls to Cosmos. Instant success.
Weekend Links | TheOriginalWinger.com
on May 8th, 2009 - 8:06pm
[...] Spangler gets us caught up with the Cosmos and Peppe Pinton. [TIAS] [...]
Franco S
on May 9th, 2009 - 6:54am
Hi Adam, one point. How is it possible that Peppe Pinton tells that he owned Lazio?
I’m Roman, I live here and I’ve been supporting Lazio since Giorgio Chinaglia was playing here, and Pinton has never been the owner of Lazio. Chinaglia was the owner and the president between 1983 and 1986, when he lost all the money he made with th Cosmos and Lazio.
I really don’t understand how Pinton could tell something like this. He was Giorgio’s agent at the time he moved from Lazio to the Cosmos and a soccer events person, but nothing elese. Then he got involved in the Cosmos with Giorgio and at the end of the NASL he remained with Cosmos’ brand in the ends.
When MLS started he was asked for the brand and he spent years asking around for a $2 millions price. One reason (not the only one, for sure) why the Cosmos never came back.
DoctorK
on May 11th, 2009 - 1:34pm
He shouldn’t have denied the MetroStars because HE WAS DENYING THE COSMOS FANBASE when he did so. Spare us the NY2 nonsense. So he licensed the name and images for the Red Bulls inaugural - GIVE IT TO US FOR GOOD!
stephen healy
on May 12th, 2009 - 6:54pm
MLS needs a glamour team. A team we all would go and see just because they are the best our league could offer. If MLS does it they better let this team be the real deal.. Look at the circus that was and maybe the LA Galaxy with Beckham… The part time soccer fans need to see a team that will win and sign stars…what every league has a few teams that sign all the greats. Let it be the Cosmos and oh yes my team the Chicago Fire….
Micronesia Justin
on May 13th, 2009 - 1:03pm
@ Franco S - very interesting tidbit there. This man is all about his ego, although he claims not to be. What an awesome article though.
Remembering the Cosmos, and an unsung legend « Online Sports Watch
on May 13th, 2009 - 4:28pm
[...] now he wants Major League Soccer to bring the Cosmos back to life. After all, if MLS can rebirth the Seattle Sounders, Portland Timbers and Vancouver Whitecaps, then [...]
Ariel Judas
on May 18th, 2009 - 2:43pm
I live in Barcelona, Spain. May be you`ve all heard about it. but after the Miami-based franchise fiasco thera are somre rumours here that link the FC Barcelona to a second MLS team in the New York area, in a joint venture with the Mets owners. Any chance of this being true? What do you think? Could Barça’s American franchise be the new Cosmos?
KT
on May 22nd, 2009 - 2:13pm
Nice work, Adam. I’d not heard of your blog before, but now I’ll check it out.
I think Peppe’s a little off his rocker, but, whatever.
Mike Juran
on Jun 16th, 2009 - 12:15pm
To most soccer fans, the Cosmos played in New Jersey (even if their theme song started with “We’re from New York City…”) I would love to see the Cosmos name back in action, perhaps as the New Jersey Cosmos, or as they were “officially” known for the last 9 years (1977-1985) of their playing existance, just “The Cosmos”!
Lee Z
on Aug 28th, 2009 - 3:55pm
Gimme a break. Pinton is greedy. How else to explain the fact that he is offering merchandise for over $200 each piece on the Cosmos web site? If he wanted to make it happen it would have happened already. Don’t forget. We are the Cosoms, the fans. Not Pinton.
We’ve started a group on Facebook to bring the team back and hopefully we can get this to heppen.
evan eleven
on Sep 25th, 2009 - 10:14pm
any news on the rumored sale of the Cosmos to Paul Kemsley? did this really happen or is it just tabloid b.s.???
leave a comment items marked with * are required