This Is American Soccer, US Soccer, MNT, WNT, and MLS - Tackling the subject of Soccer in the US, and worldwide.

the barometer

PAID FOR BY THE COMMITTEE TO… EDITION

Frustrating isn’t it Mr. Lipton?

Yesterday was one of the slowest sports days of the American calendar. Yesterday had three quality, and two meaningful soccer games on TV. Yesterday should have been a day for soccer. It was not, not anymore than any other. Why does soccer continue to rest at the fence unnoticed while everyone cranes to glimpse the media darling?

I’m not to Pia Sundhage levels quite yet—last night the new US WNT coach lost the third (and best) player for the Olympics when Abby Wambach followed Leslie Osborne and Cat Whitehill unto the disabled list with a broken leg. On the bright side, opportunities now open up for the younger class of ladies. With the new women’s professional league on the horizon, and the team trying to recover its image after the World Cup debacle, this is an important Olympics, and one that officially will end the old guard power structure hanging on from glories past. More depleted, yes, but there is now more motivation as well. I’m looking for Kai and Tarpley to continue to step it up. This team can still win, as evidenced by holding on after Wambach’s accident to beat Brazil.

Through frustration there is always opportunity.

I still think American soccer can win out. I’m just tired of seeing opportunities passed over. Yesterday was one of the slowest sports days of the American calendar. Yesterday had three quality soccer games on TV. Yesterday should have been a glorious day for soccer. Yesterday should have been a day when SUM and MLS promoted the SuperLiga and USSF promoted their Brazilian friendly. Yesterday could have found a few new fans, ticked off a few Neilson points to add to its portfolio.

Instead, yesterday just sped by like any other, soccer the quiet kid listening to headphones in the backseat.

Maybe it’s all just wishful thinking, but take for example Mixed Martial Arts, another sport feigning for respect. UFC (Ultimate Fighting Championship), the biggest brand name in the genre, promotes their programs, pay-per-view specials, and DVDs. It is something that companies tend to do when trying to sell their product and services to the consuming masses. It’s a rare thing when simple word of mouth wins over the crowd. I don’t care for professional fighting, but damn if I don’t know when the big bouts are. Until recently, ESPN didn’t pay MMA much mind. And when they do, coverage tends to be the whole “is this or isn’t this a good sport?” discussion. Sound familiar? MMA does just fine without SportsCenter, and in spite of Joe Rogan (I’m gonna tell you something, Joe Rogan, that you might now know about me…). The masses have spoken and now the Worldwide Leader is beginning to chase that cat of nine tails that whips the network with its dangling dollars.

Soccer need not become a brutal blood sport to gain attention (though pay-per-view you could talk me into maybe). But it is up to soccer’s administrative triumvirate to fill in the space the media refuses to cover. Don Garber could learn a thing or two from Dana White. Sure ESPN/ABC/Disney/god could have helped by televising the games and talking them up on SportsCenter et al instead of trolling through the over-fished hegemony of Brett Favre’s future and Josh Hamilton’s past. But you can’t force that to happen. People have to come around on their own accord.

But they (regular soccer fans and casual lovers of sport are all included here) aren’t going to come around in droves for games broadcast only on the Spanish channel, not to mention the fact that we’re told by trusted soccer media that the tournament has “little redeeming value in it.” Forget for a moment the financial finagling over the SuperLiga and its place in the crowded schedule. There’s plenty of good reasons SuperLiga is flawed. Concentrate on the fact that over the last two years it has provided mostly passionate, skilled soccer inside exciting games without widespread promotion or serious broadcast. Work out the other problems and it could be truly super. Start with telling people about it!?! Even if you have to pay for the privilege. Throw some cash at it. See what happens. Just once; you never know until you try; sometimes you have to spend money to make money; If you can’t do something right, don’t do it. If you have a plan B, you aren’t focusing enough on plan A; (add your cliche here).

Paid For By The Committee To Promote Soccer In America

Soccer could do well to treat itself like a political campaign. Every season somebody wins an election as a nobody. How? They hit the streets, buy ads in the media, and show their faces (it also helps if you have a good product/service to offer). Most basic: put yourself where people can see you. Be honest but different.

I would love to see a breakdown of how marketing dollars are spent by MLS and its clubs. I can only take a wild absurd out-of-the-blue guess and bet that you could do without some of the crap that falls under marketing/promotions and buy a few primetime ad slots, place a big game or two every year on a network (besides MLS Cup—kind of like they did with the MLS showcase before the Euro final). This could get outrageously expensive, maybe on the order of a record-breaking extreme sport extravaganza. But like a motorcyclist planning on flinging himself off an enormous ramp toward a mound of dirt with a motor between his legs you have to ask yourself: how bad do you want it? Hillary Clinton spent millions of her own money on her own campaign. SUM, MLS, and USSF need to strap on a motor and jump off the cliff. Until the mighty threesome of American soccer decides to throw a little caution to the wind and give 100 percent to the cause, fans aren’t likely to take the leap of faith. There will always be a few looking to be martyrs, but they often die alone.

Yesterday was one of the slowest sports days of the American calendar. How obvious can I make this? Even a Philly (general) sports blog talked about soccer!!! With the summer largely to itself, Major League Baseball sat for a day on its All Star laurels. It was a rare occurrence. Even a Tiger-less British Open had yet to pick up much publicity. The apple of American eyes was ripe for harvest. And there sat soccer, with two SuperLiga games and a US WNT Olympic tune-up against Brazil, with nary a word but emails to faithful friends. Which begs the question: what the?

tias_parkhurst_1.jpg
Tell me Parkhurst is thinking about the SuperLiga money share here. These were great games that deserve more coverage. Now that might begin with monetary incentive for clubs and players, but the spending shouldn’t end there. photo from ISI Photos.

Slow growth is one thing. Not providing resources for growth, however, is different. Grow me a redwood tree, a comparison I used previously with soccer in mind. But give it some fertilizer. Have patience not negligence. How many people have to point out the obvious until someone gets it right? Let us hope the answer to that question is somewhere soccer can differ from–be better than–politics.

—-

Banner photo of James Lipton and Josh Hamilton at the 2008 MLB All-Star game captured exclusively for TIAS by Yvonne Lai.

Caption/Description Santos Laguna forward Vicente Matias Vuoso (30) is pulled down by New England Revolution defender Michael Parkhurst (15). The New England Revolution defeated Santos Laguna 1-0 during a Group B match of the 2008 North American SuperLiga at Gillette Stadium in Foxborough, Massachusetts, on July 13, 2008.

By the way – I just saw this banner ad on a celebrity gossip website. That’s a start Fox Sports Espanol!

tias-ad-fse.gif

beans
on Jul 17th, 2008 - 9:39pm

I couldn’t agree with you more. If the powers that are in charge of soccer in the US don’t promote the sport at all costs, then who will? Spend some money, hire good ad / branding firms and take some chances. Soccer brands put in lots of money (and creativity) to build the sport here, why can’t the league and federation do the same?

Chris N.
on Jul 18th, 2008 - 11:11am

I don’t understand why MLS/SUM don’t play the Mexico v. USA angle that works so well with promoting the National teams’ matches.

It’s a tried and true method for drumming up support and stoking the fire so to speak. It would certainly carry more cache.

And for heavens sake please pull the media (Goal.com, et. al.), who for some strange reason can’t see that this is a better brand of soccer. It’s taken 13 years to build some of the rivalries in MLS. It’s taken just about two to build D.C./Pachuca. At least I see it as a rivalry. They always play heated battles.

Santos/Chivas was outstanding drama even if Chivas’ defense was a sieve for the entire first half.

MLS just seems intent to cut their nose off to spite their face.

Sean
on Jul 21st, 2008 - 12:52pm

The league is building itself nicely for the future. I think the more staying power it shows the more long term fans it will continue to grow. We are all anxious for the rest of the country to find the same passion and beauty that we do in soccer but it won’t happen overnight. For now I am just happy that we are even here, at a stage where those of us growing up with soccer can now watch the sport grow into it’s own.

I don’t know if it is fair to compare the growth with UFC, which essentially had a ready made fan base grown bored with the current state of boxing, anxious and bloodthirsty and willing to spend money to see more. Soccer hasn’t had a foothold here but it is coming. ALthough NASL ultimately failed it helped steer whole generations of kids into the sport. Along with basketball it is one of hte most played games in the country. MLS is the next step and it will keep getting better we just need to be patient, as hard as that may be sometimes.

Eric in Baltimore
on Jul 22nd, 2008 - 11:08am

Superliga is a pointless competition. It’s nothing more than a series of friendlies disguised as a tournament. True, there are consequences to losing, you forfeit the chance at whatever prize money there is to be won and two additional games, but other than that, there’s nothing of any real consequence on the line. Concacaf Champions League is a very promising development and all of the energies of MLS should be focused on it and the US Open Cup as the additional competitions for teams in the league.

Teams like DC United have been playing high profile friendlies for years (Bayer Leverkusen, Chelsea FC, Newcastle United, Nottingham Forest, Boca Juniors, etc. etc.) They were enjoyable diversions during the long season. Superliga is just a drain on limited resources due to the expectation that teams take the competition “seriously”

thumpjosh
on Jul 23rd, 2008 - 12:46am

the night of the pachuca v chivas usa first round game i walked into a mexican bar/pub here in minneapolis. it was packed to the brim with sunday night revelers. i was surprised that i had to ask the bar to turn on one of their many hd’s to the match. NOBODY was interested! not even passively… at first. by the second half most of the latino’s in the room i was in were watching intently.

i just kept wondering, “why was this game not just on? and why did i, a non-spanish speaking joe, need to ask for it to be on?” promotionally speaking, something was awry.

btw- i like the superliga quite a bit. aside from the above mentioned inadequacies, the play has been very exciting so far. if resources are limited on mls teams, then mls needs to wake up and allow for a reasonable increase in salary cap to accomadate the schedules. keep the superliga though.

Timoteo
on Jul 23rd, 2008 - 11:16am

Thinking WAY outside the box, why not expand the Mexican League/MLS competition to all the first division participants, almost merging the two leagues (sort of like the NL/AL where you have some interleague play that counts for the final standings)? You’d increase attendance at all those games significantly and add some great MEANINGFUL rivalries to both league’s seasons.

Dominghosa
on Jul 23rd, 2008 - 8:14pm

Funny you compare soccer to the UFC. In between the two, is where I find the current state of my journalism career.
Though soccer is a love, a passion, and an outlet I wish to write about, the current state I live in has little use of professional soccer. But it is a burgeoning MMA stronghold.
With a new law being passed here that relaxes MMA fight rules, it’s only a matter of time until fight organizations like UFC, Affliction, and the WEC to stage fights here.
And so instead of trying to barge my way into writing about professional soccer, I find myself learning everything I can about MMA. Because, at the current state of my career and residence, that is where the future lies. And that future has already started. MMA will likely be added on as a beat on top of several of my other duties.
MMA organizations know how to spread the word. They know what it takes to bust through the American sports mind.
Of course, it helps that someone always ends up bleeding at the end.

Danny in California
on Jul 23rd, 2008 - 11:03pm

As long as were all venting our frustrations on the current state of american soccer - specifically the MLS. I have a grievence. Why is every single MLS Cup aired in the mid-afternoon? Seriously the league cant get a a primtime slot for thier cup final. There is somthing unsettling to me when I watch a final at noon, then realize that the houston Dynamo’s celebration will probaly consist of a late brunch. A primtime slot isnt only better for ratings, it will also reflect on the leagues profesionalism.
The same goes for the MLS all-star agame. West Ham is scheduled to play our all-stars. Seriously, West Ham? Did they even finish in the top half of the premiership last season? I doubt that many american fans know. Sure, we havent had many super powers play our all-stars every year; there was Fullham and Everton. However, at least there were american faces on those rosters. It seems to me that the only solid way to start real buzz for this all-star game would be obviously getting the european champions… Manchester United. Think of how much more exciting it would be - even if ronaldo wont be on the field. I dont know if the MLS brass even tried to call up sir alex, but i dont think it would be hard to find the number… the club is owned by an american.
Think of the proproportions the best of the MLS against easily some of the best in the world - again even if ronaldo is injured and may be headed to Madrid, which i believe would be a very dumb move, but i digress. Not to mention, it would be i believe the first time beckham has ever plaid against his former club. But no, we get to watch West Ham and whoever they have. Maybe the MLS is scared of having thier all-stars beaten. Well i say they did a good job against Chelsea. However, if they keep getting middle of the table teams i think the win streak will be safe. I’d rather see Benfica over West Ham at least they have Freddy Adu.

Walter Rasso
on Jul 27th, 2008 - 11:40am

Everybody say something about lift the standar of playing the game, how to get more TV ratings, more people to watch it. But nothing happens, just a few more people, when them think they would get a good game. But exibitions games, there not the solution. STOP playing as a ping -pong game, REMENBER? the “BEATYFUL GAME”. Till they (Imeant everybody) start to play as the game should be. It would not be full stadiums!

leave a comment items marked with * are required

Recent Comments

  • Jacy: [Bowing down reapetedly; you are important to our grasp of how "soccer" football is developing for us. Thanks]...
  • Steven CM: One more thing, folks: Whatever it is (soccer, et al) one chooses to play for fun and/or escapism...
  • Steven CM: Contrary to “Tom from Syracuse”, some of New York State’s best soccer is played in his...
  • Sean: It is a naive and arrogant belief that all intelligent people agree on anything.
  • Ariel Judas: Nice trophy. It resembles the UEFA Champions League’s cup a little bit, doesn’t it? Tthey...