119 over 40
losing effort maybe not the only lesson for american soccer at the olympics
In the 2000 Summer Olympics in Sydney, Australia, China came home with 59 medals (28 gold), good enough for 3rd place in the medal count behind Russia and the United States, the latter of which had 91 (36 gold) and dominated the games as has become the summer ritual every four years.
In 2000, the Chinese took home exactly one medal in the Olympic sports of track and field, swimming, rowing, sailing, and canoe/kayak. There are 119 medals available in those sports, all of which the USA excels at. When China found out Beijing would be the 2008 Summer Olympic host city, the nation set forth “project 119″ to take some of those medals and add to their traditional domination in other obscure Olympic sports such as table tennis, badminton, and gymnastics, and hopefully and finally knock the USA off the medal count top spot for the first time in decades. (Russia on the other hand appears it would rather challenge the U.S. and its Allies on the geo-political instead of athletic stage).
In 2004 China took home 63 medals (32 gold) behind the U.S.’s 102 (36 gold). As of Monday at 9pm EST the count for 2008 stood at China 67 (39 gold), USA 72 (22 gold). Economist and bookmakers alike have China winning both the overall and gold medal count. Now that’s how you do national program initiatives.
In the face of this Chinese emergence under Project 119, I couldn’t help but think about our little development initiative, the United States Soccer Federation and Major League Soccer’s “Project 40,” now Generation Adidas, which was meant to develop young American players with the original goal in 1997 being to win Olympic gold on way to taking home the 2010 World Cup. How’s that working out? A Slower road, no? Nobody said communism doesn’t have its mobilization advantages.
If you watched the Opening Ceremonies of this summer’s Olympics, you learned (if you didn’t know before) that China can make a lot of people do the same thing at the same time very well. I think it’s safe to say that filmmaker Zhang Yimou’s exhibition of Chinese history and modernity will go unsurpassed for its insane production value for some time. Also safe to say, Project 119 is a success even before most of its events take place thanks to the same discipline and devotion that produced the I-can’t-say-this-enough-times-and-I-don’t-care-how-much-it-costs ridiculous Opening Ceremony.
The same can not be said for Project 40, which is coming up on its self imposed deadline. Or the entirety of American soccer development for that matter. Should we dump it along with Olympic soccer? Why haven’t American soccer’s initiatives had similar success to China’s 119? Could American soccer learn something from the Chinese?
American soccer is but a blip on the athletically packed radar of the nation at large. USSF and MLS are wealthy but still just independent organizations. Project 40/Generation Adidas gives service to but a handful of kids every year. At present we have a loose-knit framework set up for countrywide development. Truly intense schooling is the rarest of exceptions, not the rule. To the Chinese the Olympics mean, well, a bit more. Project 119 calls upon 1.3 billion people. The government scoops up toddlers with the slightest inkling of talent and places them in intense professional development. Like East Germany before the Wall fell, China is taking to burgeoning its Olympic dreams like most countries take to building a military, something you would think the mighty USofA would know a little something about. But as with a soccer stars in the sporting culture, this kind of development intensity is rare bird in U.S. It’s hard to believe the U.S. could or would ever do something so systematically. You will never see an opening ceremony like Beijing’s on U.S. soil.
beyond 2010
No one in their right mind thinks the US MNT is going to win the World Cup in 2010, giving Project 40 a air of sarcasm and grandstanding in the face of what the project and U.S. development on the whole has accomplished. Now one would bet on it, but that is not to say the team can’t win an Olympics or World Cup. They can, and if and when they do, that victory will be much more enjoyable than one in which athletic factories become necessary for winning. But American soccer is up against the World in the most popular sport, a team sport on top of that, not some obscure extremely particular individual skill. For those reasons, maybe a Project 119-type soccer program could never work for soccer.
But is soccer in America really that much different than those “sports”? Michael Phelps is now more famous than any American soccer player. So maybe we need to begin treating soccer’s development like an Olympic sport, systematically building it from the bottom up, quickly and with the finest advisers the world has to offer.
Domination begins with money. The Chinese borrowed a few hundred dump trucks from their countless construction sites, filled them with coin, and set to work (allbeit in sports other than soccer). USSF and MLS in comparison are flipping through their wallets with unknown amounts in the bank. One could argue that given the few resources USSF and MLS have, they have made enormous strides. That’s the infrastructure, then there is the athletes. Michael Phelps aside, in the U.S. there is little to gain from most Olympic pursuits. Maybe you get a sponsorship, a Wheaties box, a commercial or two. Mostly you have that old Olympic standby: pride. You have it forever, but it does little but tug on the ears of grandchildren as you grow old. You will surely find interest, but not the kind you can spend. Outside of Forrest Gump, name one table tennis star. Badminton? Kayaking? Soccer? Aside from the rare few, most American soccer players like Olympians (and some of them are Olympians) aren’t going to see a windfall of riches from their athletic pursuits.
In China, these obscure athletes are taken in and taken care of, and if TV broadcasters are to be believed that development environment makes USSF’s soccer academy in Bradenton, Florida, look like a party school. Did you see the female Chinese Olympic gymnastic captain prepare herself for the vault? A No Limit Soldier that one. They are famous national heroes, but are the Chinese athletes happy? Do they lead healthy lives, or are the tears they shed upon Olympic defeat a microcosm of their lives?
Nobody can answer that but the athletes. We barely know how they live. Like Hollywood stars? Prisoners? Whatever that answer they appear so single minded in their pursuits that any and all mystery only increases the discipline and furthers their athletic success. Sure we get Benny Feilhaber lip synching to his favorite pop songs, and that’s great–it really is, that kind of access and intimacy from professional athletes–but discipline and success are two things rarely used in descriptions of American soccer–and two things that were clearly deficient during the U.S. Olympic soccer team’s performances this year.
But does the choice have to be between a quickly built militaristic monopoly or the long unmanageable climb through a democratic culture of choice, where things above all are supposed to be fun? Can not there be a happy medium? Is that happy medium multiplying residence academies and increasing wages and star power and creative coaches and playing fields enough to lure young players away form other sports, the extreme being some sort of USA Premiere League? Too crazy to think about? What If MLS bought some land and built a nice field in the middle of Manhattan, an MSG for soccer–would people flock? Is spend spend spend the only way to go about it besides indoctrination? Even if they did open the vault, you have to wonder whether all the money in the world could ever bring the American masses to this–as my high school PE teacher/football, baseball coach called it–communist sport?
2010 is almost here. World Cup qualifying picks up this week. American soccer needs to begin asking these questions. By 2011 the World Cup will be past and a new collective bargaining agreement between MLS and its players union should be in place. The second decade of the new millennium could be soccer’s Y2K. Those with knowledge and power should be already examining the future potential of the old machines to ensure their potential for growth. After all, moral victories are a thing of the past. With a new bargaining agreement likely to give more resources to MLS teams, coaches, and players in 2010, and with USSF set to bid on the 2018 World Cup, the turn of the decade will prove to be an important one for soccer in this country. How MLS and USSF set the table will mean everything for American soccer’s next generation. Will it stay with the Project 40 and national networks or could a large-scale mobilization be necessary to secure those grandiose goals?
—-
banner photo of a man playing table tennis in the park in Beijing from Associated Press via Daily Life














Chris
on Aug 18th, 2008 - 7:54pm
Wait, I’m confused. Are you saying the Chinese program is a good thing or a bad thing?
Andy
on Aug 18th, 2008 - 8:37pm
I agree with Chris. Is this a statement for or against Project 40?
In theory, Project 40 was definitely created with the right intentions and initial proper game plan. Unfortunately, the follow through has been somewhat lacking.
However, the success of American soccer players throughout the world has never been better. American soccer players are playing everyone from South America to Asia to the Middle East to Europe. There are more European based American soccer players than ever before.
Thus, Project 40 has definitely helped spur a growth in technical development increasing the ability of youth players and young adult players to play at higher levels across the world. In time, the US will be among the world’s best. They have cracked the top 15 world rankings.
Adam
on Aug 19th, 2008 - 5:11am
I guess this is what editors are for. sorry for any confusion. the point is not the Project 40 was or is unsuccessful. as noted by commenters, there are more American players everywhere, not to mention all the olympians were professional (first time ever). Anyone reading TIAS has heard me praise the growth of American soccer and note the big strides made.
It’s just that project 119 did something pretty amazing and it makes me wonder what would be possible in soccer. Should American soccer move in that direction if our nation isn’t going to produce the best soccer players like it does so many athletes?
Can we learn something from the way Olympians train? Is it the right way to do something? Could it work for soccer? How badly do we want to win?
There are always several different paths to choose from. US chose a slow, gradual path. China did not. Neither is right or wrong. Just different. After 2010, American soccer will again have to choose.
Kyle
on Aug 19th, 2008 - 8:35am
One of the advantages to ignoring civil rights is that you don’t have to deal with the messy lines that have to be drawn to protect those rights. While I’m sure the chinese olympians have better lives than their average countrymen and may be quite content doing what they are doing, they also probably don’t have a lot of choice in the matter, and once they exceed their shelf life, I’m guessing, they don’t get a lot of opportunities in pursuing other careers. Lastly, while ‘119′ might be successful, China’s soccer team still sucks which I think speaks to the difficulties of project 40’s task and in many ways highlights its successes, which isn’t to suggest the program couldn’t use some serious retooling.
Larry
on Aug 19th, 2008 - 9:37am
If you haven’t noticed, the Chinese Olympic approach has failed in soccer. It crashed and burned in the last World Cup qualifier, where China finished last behind Qatar and Iraq. It failed in the recent Olympics, where the only points came in a draw with mighty New Zealand.
Recent articles in the NY Times, BBC and Newsweek have covered this.
The irony is that, unlike in the US, soccer is one of the top sports in China and peers with table tennis, basketball, and badminton. Chinese professional league players average more than US$146,000 in salary. Money, resources and government support is not lacking.
Chris
on Aug 19th, 2008 - 10:02am
Maybe we need another soccer revolution in this country with a nice purge starting at the top of USSF.
Adam
on Aug 19th, 2008 - 10:26am
that’s precisely why I didn’t make much mention of Chinese soccer, Larry. it’s bigtime over there. I was trying to highlight the growth of the outlier sports, which is the only reason why i thought it was at least a good experiment to consider Project 119 as a US Soccer property. As noted in the piece, clearly it is not something that can work for a sport like soccer, but its methods… are they all worthless?
thumpjosh
on Aug 19th, 2008 - 10:57am
do you have some thoughts on the US nat’l team direction? voice your concerns to Sunil. USSF needs to listen to it’s supporters.
Sunil Gulati, the head of USSF contact info
E-mail Address:
skg21@columbia.edu
Address:
Economics Department, Columbia University
1125 International Affairs Building, MC 3308
420 West 118th Street
New York NY 10027
nlawtrojan
on Aug 19th, 2008 - 8:00pm
The New York Times last week discussed how China has failed to develop a successful soccer team. Interesting article. http://www.nytimes.com/2008/08/15/sports/olympics/15soccer.html?_r=1&scp=1&sq=china%20soccer&st=cse&oref=slogin
mexicanbluefish
on Aug 22nd, 2008 - 12:41pm
I think it’s the complexities of football itself tht makes it hard to simply make a plan, fill it with resources and expect to win it all. The Chinese are not going to win gold in football. Hasn’t their project, therefore, failed? It is the world’s sport, isn’t it. Wouldn’t the Chinese want to win it? Why don’t they?
Timoteo
on Aug 22nd, 2008 - 2:25pm
I believe the success of a sport is directly related to the number of youths in a country who play the game for hours everyday. This is not happening in the U.S. While there may be great participation in youth soccer in the U.S., it is composed mainly of kids who practice and play 2-3 hours per week. The rest of the time they are watching tv or playing video games. When someone figures out how to get kids to play soccer every spare moment that they have, like they do in Latin America, Africa, and to some extend in Europe than the U.S. will start producing young players with the technical skills, creativity, and athleticism to compete with anyone. This is what is lacking now. Soccer skills cannot be developed going to practice a few days a week. They are developed and learned on sandlots playing for hours in pickup games with neighborhood kids of all ages. I believe that this is what clubs, and the USSF should figure out how to foster in our kids, since the present generation does not go out and play, like generations of kids before them.
With a little imagination, I believe it can be done.
One advantage that today’s kids do have is access to watching soccer being played at the highest levels on TV. This inspires kids to try new techniques and tricks.
Andrew
on Aug 23rd, 2008 - 3:39pm
Soccer has a relatively good base, but that base has two major problems.
1. All kinds of kids play soccer, but all too often it involves the “everyone gets a medal” kind of wimpy soccer. If there is no incentive for a kid to work on his skills, he won’t do it.
2. When kids get old enough to play soccer on the high school level, all too often the most talented kids choose to play football or basketball. When the day comes that they choose soccer, the US will be a soccer superpower.
Domenech Mariano Ariel
on Oct 16th, 2008 - 8:31am
I am Mariano. I´m writing from Argentine. I am very good at playing soccer but in my country, where soccer players like Messi, Maradona or Riquelme are very know, there are also a huge numbers of boys like I, whom are not know and any soccer club want give us a oportunity. By this letter, I ask someone, just one chance…. just one, because soccer it´s all I love. Family and soccer. No more… I have 21 years old. I am a Buenos Aires Univesity student. I´ll be thank who can help me. Thanks a lot.
The Endline » Blog Archive » Project 2010: A look at U.S. Soccer and P-40
on Mar 9th, 2010 - 4:45pm
[...] come to fruition and we bring home the cup. I’m not here to blast U.S. soccer and MLS but to look back and evaluate if the programs instituted in 1998 are performing as intended. ESPN’s Outside the Lines [...]
leave a comment items marked with * are required