from feilhaber to football
special to tias, a guest column by Ryan O’Hanlon
“American soccer” seems to be a redundant term. Is the United States just trying to be different from the rest of the world? Is this a metric system situation? Australia kicked soccer to the curb in 2004 when it officially announced that ‘football’ was the proper nomenclature. New Zealand and South Africa still commonly use the term soccer, but I’m beginning to think ’soccer’ is more than just a word. It represents how the game is played, especially here in the United States. Watch any game, whether MLS, Division 1, or even the US National team, and soccer is what you get - a sport that relies on physical strength, speed, and supreme conditioning over tactical acumen or technical skill.
Soccer can still be the beautiful game, but too often it is the waiting game.
The waiting begins at the youth level when physically weaker and smaller players go unselected in the various premier clubs, ODP teams, etc, etc. If you can get that center forward who is a foot taller than every other kid, then you win. It’s the American way (Supersize Me!). Just overpower everyone else and get that ball on the big guy’s head in the box. Sure, it kills when you’re thirteen, and even occasionally when you’re Peter Crouch, but there’s a reason why Peter Crouch and others like Jan Koller are not the best strikers in the world. Same goes for the likes of Oguchi Onyewu on the back line.
Football is won by a superior tactical awareness and technical ability, not physical prowess. Take Italy for example. They don’t have anyone who is overly strong or exceptionally fast, but every player on that team knows the game, knows his role, and does it to the best of his ability. The result was a World Cup trophy.
Going from team dynamics to individual presence, take a look at Juan Roman Riquelme. One could make an argument that Riquelme is the best player in the world (see Ray Hudson). Even if he isn’t, it is accepted that Riquelme is ONE of the best players in the World, but is he fast enough to run by defenders? Absolutely not. Is he so tall that he towers over defenders? Nope. Strong enough to leave the opposition in a crumpled heap? 0 for 3.
So what exactly can this guy do?
He can play football. Riquelme almost never runs more than 10 yards at a time. Instead, he uses his knowledge of the game to play balls that put his teammates into dangerous positions. This passing ability and his deadly shot make Riquelme one of the most dangerous players in the World.
This could be an over exaggeration, but if Riquelme was American, he may have been overlooked at a young age. Likewise with the wizardry (and growth hormones) of Lionel Messi. In some crowded tryout, maybe they don’t stand out like a McBride, Onyewu, or Ching, but get the flow of the game moving and they become the standouts beyond the target players. Sure, someone with the skills of Riquelme or Messi will eventually rise to the top level. Proper youth development in one form or another set these guys up for success, or at least the chance for it.
Enter my American Riquelme, Benny Feilhaber.
Feilhaber spent the first six years of his life in Brazil, where he started to develop and learn the importance of the technical aspect of the game. He then moved to the US and spent time moving from state to state. Eventually, Benny and his family settled in California. There, he won the national championship with his club team from Irvine, but was only lightly recruited coming out of high school. The Brazilian-born American of Austrian descent decided to attend UCLA. He would have to try-out. Feilhaber made the team and went from someone who was unsure that he would even play college ball to a freshmen starter on one of the best teams in the country.
Based on his performances at UCLA, the walk-on was selected to the United States U20 National Team for the 2005 World Youth Championships. He was offered a contract by Bundesliga power Hamburg. He accepted, left UCLA, and made starts in the Champions League.
Since then, Benny has moved onto premiership side Derby County, and while early playing time has been surprisingly tough to come by on the relegation-zone team (wtf?), he is a mainstay in the lineup for the US MNT. He is the number 10 that the US has never had, and it appears that Bob Bradley believes in him (a good sign for a man unwilling to play a lot of the younger prospects). Hopefully that trust continues.
How, then, can someone of Feilhaber’s caliber fall though the cracks of the national team system and not go noticed until after his first year in college, which oh by the way he had to walk onto? Some will say that it is the flawed scouting system in place that leaves too many rocks unturned. Others might say players development at different stages and Benny was a late bloomer. But how do you explain his amateur, teen-aged success? The answer speaks more to the type of player that the scouts are looking for. Feilhaber doesn’t have the physical attributes that seem to make American scouts drool. He’s not big, rippled with muscles, or exceedingly fast. He is just a skilled tactical player who understands the game.
Until the U.S. produces more players like Feilhaber we will all be confined to watching “soccer” when we tune into our national team. Hopefully the emergence of Benny and others will lead to more footballers being brought into the national team fold. Who knows, maybe the USSF reverts back to its original name, the U.S. Football Association, a variation of which the organization used from its inception in 1914 until it dropped the word ‘football’ in 1974. Until then, we’re left with soccer.
—-
Born and raised on Long Island, Ryan O’Hanlon currently attends Holy Cross College in Worcester, Massachusetts, where he plays varsity soccer (tied for first place in the the first division’s Patriot League in case you were wondering). His reporting can be found at American Soccer Daily.
—-
banner photo credit: ISI Photos














Nick Iadanza
on Nov 12th, 2007 - 3:34pm
I agree with your comments whole heartedly. As a coach both at the Club and Div. I College level, the better play comes from the club level. Players are trained to be both technically and tactically prepared for the next level. Unfortunately the next level of college is not what they were trained to do. There are very few college coaches playing or teaching the game, the pure game of soccer. Their job is to win. There is NO penalty for ugly soccer. So why change, just win baby. Aren’t they supposed to tarin their players for the next level? How can we expect our National team to succeed at the highest level when the ball is being dropped on the college level. First year college players are suprised, upset, and quiting the game because of the style of college soccer and are not enjoying the game they were taught to play when they were youngsters. The U.S. governing body needs to step in and start dictating to the colleges what they expect to be taught, trained, and accomplished.
David Keyes
on Nov 12th, 2007 - 6:15pm
Not to spam your blog with a link to my own, but people might also be interested to read a bit I’ve written about Benny: http://cultureofsoccer.com/2007/03/28/player-focus-benny-feilhaber/
Robert Daley
on Nov 13th, 2007 - 8:07am
I enjoyed this article immensely and believe it is right on. With the number of American youths playing soccer competitively through High School you would think we’d be more competitive than we’ve been at this point, especially the last few years. I would agree it’s because the nuances of the “beautiful game” get pushed to the side. Hopefully we can cheange that around and begin to devlop real football players.
Jacy
on Nov 13th, 2007 - 8:33am
Benny is legit. Sal Zizzo from U20s as well. Think those two will be constants as we approach 2010 and head towards 2014.
Sean
on Nov 13th, 2007 - 2:29pm
I’m not quite ready to annoit Benny the midfield savior of American soccer, but I agree there are huge problems with the way we scout and develop youth talent here. We’ve all read articles of countless players that are forced to walk on at colleges (seems like several other national team members were walk ons as well) or go somewhere else to play just to get attention. I think alot of it has to do with the American mentality that we always ahve the best athletes. I’ve heard alot of people growing up tell me that once America’s top athletes are playing soccer we’ll be a world power without a doubt. We’ve all probably seen, been around, or personally experienced more talented players passed up for more talented athletes in our youth system. But anyone who saw us stick with the World Cup champs while a man down should know we aren’t lacking for athletic ability, more in soccer intelligence. For whatever reason our players, while physically top of the game, are unable to think their way through a tough match. Watch any game against an organized European opponent and we just can’t break down the defense, the team entirely too dependent on speed to cause problems or height to win crosses. I don’t know if there is an answer other than to hope that the more kids continueing to play at a young age the harder it will be for the tiny geniuses of the sport to slip through the cracks. Probably has something to do with lack of pick up games as well but thats another gripe.
kyle
on Nov 13th, 2007 - 4:43pm
preaching to the converted. I also think it has to do with the fact that Men’s soccer is such a neglected sport at the college level, relatively speaking. Neither the SEC nor the Big Twelve (and I’m sure a few others) even field men’s varsity teams. Before someone mentions South Carolina, they are in Conference USA or something to that effect. You have to be willing to invest in the sport at the college level and title XI doesn’t really make much room for it.
Frenzel Washington
on Nov 14th, 2007 - 2:10pm
Isn’t Ray Hudson the greatest color commentator of all time!
Dave
on Nov 15th, 2007 - 9:21am
Having never been a top-level soccer player (or footballer for that matter) I can’t speak for the ODP situation or even what top club teams look like. But I did play for a long time, starting at 4 years old. I also get a chance to see youth soccer often at field near my house. Unfortuanately, I still here and see the same things going on that I did in 1986. Namely, parents and coaches encouraging the “big boot” and more than any other thing pushing the bigger kids who have learned to toe the ball longer than their smaller counterparts being lauded as the best players on the team. Beyond that, at a young age we pressure youth players to win, and perhaps encouraging them to have fun with the game would produce more creative players willing to take on defenders.
I think this is an extension of the American attitude towards sports (and politics for that matter) that brute force is more effective than any other method. Until our kids are learning to play soccer and most importantly to have fun, try new things, and experiment while doing it the U.S. will lack players with flair like Riquelme or Zidane. I would say that, generally, for younger kids the only american tactic is Route 1 long ball and that is just a shame.
John
on Nov 15th, 2007 - 11:25am
Great piece. I think Crouch is actually quite skillful though, not the best in the world but surprisingly agile for his height.
I caught a division one college game the other day, and while both teams had great athletes, and I’m sure skillful players, the game was played at a fast pace, and neither team tried to settle the ball and play skillfully. Maybe winning at all costs is a part of the problem too. In truth though, the teams that play good soccer, control the ball, I think would win in the end. Teams with the most college championships are teams like UCLA and Virginia, I’m guessing.
I’m always interested in the idea of how players develop. Early on there’s less stress on winning and a bit more freedom, but then as competition becomes tougher, there’s less and less room for players to play freely and make mistakes or say the smaller skillful players are push out. It’s kind of like when the great players grow up playing in the streets, playing freely, and develop unique abilities to dribble like Messi or pass like Riquelme.
At the same time though, these great players grew up playing in intense surroundings, I believe even playing for money as Tevez did in the tough streets of Argentina. I guess, when developing creative players, you need a bit of both, intensity but also the freedom to try things. Passion. The best players spend all day with the ball.
Why no tell your fullbacks in college to take one more touch and try to pick out the forward with a ball rather than just blindly booting the ball down field, you can play direct and still be playing pretty “soccer”, great goals come from two or three passes many times–their just precise. That’s one thing that Feilheber does, plays beautiful passes, so rare in a US player. Yeah, wtf, why isn’t he playing for Derby?
RyDe tIlL i DiE $on KrIpKillaZ alL DaiiY
on Nov 18th, 2007 - 8:07pm
RYAN O’HANLON IS A BEAST NO DOUBT GREAT ARTICLE PLAYAAAAAA I LOVE YOU HUNNY!!!!!!!!!
Mattyo
on Nov 19th, 2007 - 9:31pm
Great article, and I agree with most of it. Just a few points - first of all, don’t think that European and Latin American nations don’t drool at the site of a player like Luca Toni or Michael Ballick. That’s why those guys start for their respective nations, as much for their size as their skill. Having said that, I believe scouts for the US program do look too much at height and speed alone, but nowadays you can’t compete with European teams without some size and strength.
The bottom line is, we have a cultural handicap in the US when it comes to the Beautiful Game, whatever you call it. Ryan has simply rolled up that handicap up in the name “footall” vs “soccer,” but remember that it is not the name that counts - its’ the culture behind the name. Calling it Football is not going to help us develop or play better. BTW, Italy also departs from the norm calling their sport “Calcio,” not futbol or other Latin variation. They won a world cup last year, so let’s not focus on what the sport is called.
I recently officiated a JC men’s game and it was some of the best soccer I have seen in the US, but many of the players were foreign players. We would greatly benefit from recruiting more of that foreign influence in our college system both at the player and coaching level. Universities could also take a page out of the book of schools like Brigham Young University who nearly every year travel to other countries to play professional teams. But Title IX has made it so that men’s college soccer will never be the proving ground that it could have been. Great that it has helped women play more sports in college, but the level of play in many women’s sports at many levels is so far below what anyone would expect that it is mostly wasted money and effort. Bring it back to an appropriate level of funding based on where the actual interest lies from individual players and we might be able to get something out of the college system.
Sean
on Nov 21st, 2007 - 12:48am
wow….quite an interesting take….this was the first article i have ever read on this blog, and i must say….i’m very impressed
Bill Caspar
on Nov 28th, 2007 - 7:06pm
Good article. Much is true. But I do believe part of the problem is that most of the best athletes go into other more popular American sports as baseball, football, basketball. This leaves lesser talented athletes to the sport of soccer. Regardless if some of them are bigger or stronger, many of these going to other sports could be the tecnically and tactically superior soccer players, unfortunately they go to other sports. So part of the solution is to get soccer more embedded into the culture, so little Johnny watches soccer matches on tv with dad rather than just baseball or basketball. Some of this is happening with the new smaller soccer stadiums such as LA Galaxy and Red Bulls. Strides are also being made with the interest Beckham and Blanco are generating. But it will still take time. That’s the cold truth.
BTW, we did poorly in my opinion due to poor coaching. Arena, sorry, terrible job. Donovan and the others never took anyone on. Only played the ball back or long ball. Since this was done by everyone on the US team, it had to be a coaching decision or lack of coaching. It really was horrible to watch. I still believe with the existing talent we can and will do better.
Daniel
on Dec 5th, 2007 - 6:23pm
Tactical skill is definitely starting to win games in American soccer. As a high school player, our team was lucky enough to have an Italian coach this year. There’s been a definite difference between him and the American he succeeded. Our record did a 180 as well. From 8 points last year to 34 this year in a 12 game season. Our team remained relatively unchanged.
In the MLS tactics have led directly to success as well. Look at the Revolution. Parkhurst, Heaps, Ralston, Twellman and Noonan, all American, are some of the best in the league at their position and none of them are exceptionally fast, tall or strong. I’d love to see a USMT squad including Parkhurst and Twellman replacing Onyewu and Ching or Johnson.
Emily
on Dec 12th, 2007 - 2:44pm
Wow. This is one of the best blogs that I have ever read. I completely agree with everything that was said.
As a U16 player currently playing select and high school soccer, I have seen this sort of thing happen many times. The coaches go for the biggest, the strongest, and the fastest while overlooking those who have a true knowledge of the game but might not be as physically intimidating. It isn’t even about looking for those with the mind of a footballer. I really hope that the U.S. can make the switch from “soccer” to “football”. It would make the game so much more enjoyable for those of us already playing the beautiful game, football, in a country filled with soccer.
Tomas
on Dec 30th, 2007 - 7:59pm
Ryan and Nick (directed at you because you are a college coach and should know better) — While you have a point that American soccer is in great need of more technically gifted players, the reason is not because bigger players are chosen more often. It is because many players can’t afford to play on premiere clubs, ODP, and attend college showcases. In the U.S., soccer is an upper middle class sport where parents who dole out the most amount of cash will give their child a better opportunity to succeed–leaving out many gifted players. It’s all about inequality and class. Unlike the rest of the world (Argentina, Brazil, and France, for example), the U.S. youth system is flawed and caters to players who come from more affluent neighborhoods. Players like Ronaldo, Carlos Tevez, and Lionel Messi would never have had the opportunity to play for the bigger, better funded clubs if they had to play in the U.S. youth system. They would be left behind, never able to show their talent which we all love and are thankful for.
leave a comment items marked with * are required